Re: [RFC v2 5/7] powerpc: atomic: Implement cmpxchg{,64}_* and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_* variants

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:12:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> What C11 does is to allow the developer to specify different orderings
> on success and failure.  But it is no harder to supply a barrier (if
> needed) on the failure path, right?

Quite right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/