Re: [RFC v2 4/7] powerpc: atomic: Implement xchg_* and atomic{,64}_xchg_* variants

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:09:09AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > I must say I'm somewhat surprised by this level of relaxation, I had
> > expected to only loose SMP barriers, not the program order ones.
> > 
> > Is there a good argument for this?
> 
> Yes, when we say "relaxed", we really mean relaxed.  ;-)
> 
> Both the CPU and the compiler are allowed to reorder around relaxed
> operations.

Is this documented somewhere, because I completely missed this part.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/