Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] uio_msi: device driver

From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Thu Oct 01 2015 - 21:39:16 EST


On 10/01/2015 05:04 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:43:23 -0700
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, but in the case of something like a VF it is going to just make a
bigger mess of things since INTx doesn't work. So what would you expect
your driver to do in that case? Also we have to keep in mind that the
MSI-X failure case is very unlikely.

One other thing that just occurred to me is that you may want to try
using the range allocation call instead of a hard set number of
interrupts. Then if you start running short on vectors you don't hard
fail and instead just allocate what you can.
I tried that but the bookkeeping gets messy since there is no good
way to communicate that back to userspace and have it adapt.

Actually I kind of just realized that uio_msi_open is kind of messed up. So if the MSI-X allocation fails due to no resources it will return a positive value indicating the number of vectors that could be allocated, a negative value if one of the input values is invalid, or 0. I'm not sure if returning a positive value on failure is an issue or not. I know the open call is supposed to return a negative value or the file descriptor if not negative. I don't know if the return value might be interpreted as a file descriptor or not.

Also if MSI-X is supported by the hardware, but disabled for some reason by the kernel ("pci=nomsi") then this driver is rendered inoperable since it will never give you anything but -EINVAL from the open call.

I really think you should probably look at taking care of enabling MSI-X and maybe MSI as a fall-back in probe. At least then you can post a message about how many vectors are enabled and what type. Then if you cannot enable any interrupts due to MSI being disabled you can simply fail at probe time and let then load a different driver.

- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/