Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Linus,

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:34:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_gpio_irq_set_type':
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:170:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__irq_set_handler_locked' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    __irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq);
>    ^
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:925:3: warning: passing argument 2 of 'irq_set_chained_handler' from incompatible pointer type
>    irq_set_chained_handler(res->start, atmel_gpio_irq_handler);
>    ^
> In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:6:0,
>                  from include/asm-generic/gpio.h:12,
>                  from arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h:9,
>                  from include/linux/gpio.h:48,
>                  from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:18:
> include/linux/irq.h:548:1: note: expected 'irq_flow_handler_t' but argument is of type 'void (*)(unsigned int,  struct irq_desc *)'
>  irq_set_chained_handler(unsigned int irq, irq_flow_handler_t handle)
>  ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   776180848b57 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller")
> 
> I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20150924 for today.

I am still getting this error.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/