Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Check for errors before kfree

[Chandra Gorentla]

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:39:11PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:47:35PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> > During the clean-up of the function, it is need to check if
> > errors occurred, not the memory pointer.
> >
> 
> The bug here is that we have a use after free on the success path.  It
> should have been mentioned in the changelog.
> 
> Anyway, this patch is buggy.  If result == -EFAULT then it will crash.
> Also this patch is really ugly.  There is someone who is going to send a
> correct fix (just add a return 0).
> 
> This driver usese "do everything" style error handling.  It is a bug
> prone anti-pattern because doing everything is more complicated than
> doing one thing.  You can easily see it is bug prone, because it made
> you introduce a bug, right?
> 
> Instead the error handling should look like this:
> 
> 	return 0;
> 
> err_free_msg:
> 	kfree(pstrMessage);
> 
> 	return ret;
> 
> There are no error paths where we need to free "pstrMessage->pvBuffer"
> but if we were to add one it would look like this:
> 
> 	return 0;
> 
> err_pvbuffer:
> 	kfree(pstrMessage->pvBuffer);
> err_msg:
> 	kfree(pstrMessage);
> 
> 	return ret;
> 
> This is a minimal, uncomplicated, no indenting, no if statement way of
> unwinding.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
OK.  There is a problem in this patch.  I will correct it, reorganize the
patch series.

Thank you,
chandra

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/