Re: [PATCH] ebpf, events: make it actually more configurable

[Ingo Molnar]

* Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/03/2015 08:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>While testing some other BPF issue, I realized that BPF_EVENTS is
> >>actually not accessible through menuconfig because of a missing
> >>description that needs to be attached to the bool. After the patch
> >>the entry shows up in menuconfig and can be enabled/disabled from
> >>there.
> >
> > Yeah, so the principle is the following: the main configuration option for it 
> > is BPF_SYSCALL. The BPF_EVENTS is an internal detail, always enabled when 
> > possible, and we make it so that if the BPF syscall is enabled, we'll enable 
> > the perf integration if all the must-have components are in place:
> 
> Makes sense, yes. I probably got confused due to the help text on the hidden 
> Kconfig entry, but that can nevertheless serve as documentation purpose.

Feel free to send a patch that adds a sentence to that help text that explains 
that this is an internal helper Kconfig entry that does not need to be 
interactively configurable.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/