Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added a blank line

[Drokin, Oleg]

On Oct 3, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Anjali Menon wrote:

> Added a blank line after declaration to fix the coding
> style warning detected by checkpatch.pl
> 
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon <cse.anjalimenon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> index aec9a44..a626871 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static void sort_add_capa(struct obd_capa *ocapa, struct list_head *head)
> static inline int obd_capa_open_count(struct obd_capa *oc)

This whole file has been recently removed.
In general at least with Lustre (and probably with other staging code) it's best to
base your work on Greg's staging-next (or even staging-testing) tree because this
is where the most up to date code is (And this is where Greg tries to apply it anyway).

> {
> 	struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(oc->u.cli.inode);
> +
> 	return atomic_read(&lli->lli_open_count);
> }
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/