Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Move spin lock to the start of critical section

From: Greg KH
Date: Sun Oct 04 2015 - 04:43:47 EST


On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:57:29PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> The spin_lock_irqsave is moved to just beginning of critical section.
> This change moves a couple of return statements out of the lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chandra S Gorentla <csgorentla@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c
> index d5ebd6d..284a3f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ int wilc_mq_send(WILC_MsgQueueHandle *pHandle,
> goto ERRORHANDLER;
> }
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pHandle->strCriticalSection, flags);
> -
> /* construct a new message */
> pstrMessage = kmalloc(sizeof(Message), GFP_ATOMIC);

As you have moved the lock, can you also change this to GFP_KERNEL as
well because we do not have a lock held?

And how have you tested that this is ok? What is this lock trying to
protect?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/