Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: drop unlikely behind WARN_ON()

From: Kalle Valo
Date: Mon Oct 05 2015 - 07:23:39 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86/process: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()"
Previous message: Boris Brezillon: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM""
In reply to: Johannes Berg: "Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: drop unlikely behind WARN_ON()"
Next in thread: Geliang Tang: "[PATCH v2] ath6kl: drop unlikely behind WARN_ON()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The subject is entirely wrong - this is not a cfg80211 patch.

Yes, please use prefix "ath6kl: ".

--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86/process: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()"
Previous message: Boris Brezillon: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM""
In reply to: Johannes Berg: "Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: drop unlikely behind WARN_ON()"
Next in thread: Geliang Tang: "[PATCH v2] ath6kl: drop unlikely behind WARN_ON()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]