Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] fuse: break infinite loop in fuse_fill_write_pages()

From: Maxim Patlasov
Date: Mon Oct 05 2015 - 14:37:28 EST


On 10/02/2015 06:58 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:27:45 -0700 Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 10/02/2015 04:21 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
Bump. Add more peopple in CC.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Roman Gushchin <klamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I got a report about unkillable task eating CPU. Thge further
investigation shows, that the problem is in the fuse_fill_write_pages()
function. If iov's first segment has zero length, we get an infinite
loop, because we never reach iov_iter_advance() call.
iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic() eventually calls iterate_iovec(). The
latter silently consumes zero-length iov. So I don't think "iov's first
segment has zero length" can cause infinite loop.
I'm suspecting it got stuck because local variable `bytes' is zero, so
the code does `goto again' repeatedly.

Or maybe not. A more complete description of the bug would help.
I suspect here is the same scenario like in 124d3b7041f:
Zero-length segmend is followed by segment with invalid address:
iov_iter_fault_in_readable() checks only first segment (zero-length)
iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic() skips it, fails at second and
returns zero -> goto again without skipping zero-length segment.

Patch calls iov_iter_advance() before goto again: we'll skip zero-length
segment at second iteraction and iov_iter_fault_in_readable() will detect
invalid address.

Makes sense to me. The patch looks fine.

Thanks,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/