Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: db9 - store object at correct index
From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Mon Oct 05 2015 - 20:32:14 EST
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:54:56PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> The variable i is used to check the port to attach to and we are
> supposed to save the reference of struct db9 in the location given by
> db9_base[i]. But after finding out the index, i is getting modified again
> so we saved in a wrong index.
> While at it mark db9_base[i] as NULL after it is freed.
>
> Fixes: 2260c419b52b ("Input: db9 - use parallel port device model")
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied the lot, thank you.
> ---
> drivers/input/joystick/db9.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/joystick/db9.c b/drivers/input/joystick/db9.c
> index cf1f602..932d073 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/joystick/db9.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/joystick/db9.c
> @@ -560,25 +560,25 @@ static void db9_attach(struct parport *pp)
> const struct db9_mode_data *db9_mode;
> struct pardevice *pd;
> struct input_dev *input_dev;
> - int i, j;
> + int i, j, port_idx;
> int mode;
> struct pardev_cb db9_parport_cb;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < DB9_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
> - if (db9_cfg[i].nargs == 0 ||
> - db9_cfg[i].args[DB9_ARG_PARPORT] < 0)
> + for (port_idx = 0; port_idx < DB9_MAX_PORTS; port_idx++) {
> + if (db9_cfg[port_idx].nargs == 0 ||
> + db9_cfg[port_idx].args[DB9_ARG_PARPORT] < 0)
> continue;
>
> - if (db9_cfg[i].args[DB9_ARG_PARPORT] == pp->number)
> + if (db9_cfg[port_idx].args[DB9_ARG_PARPORT] == pp->number)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (i == DB9_MAX_PORTS) {
> + if (port_idx == DB9_MAX_PORTS) {
> pr_debug("Not using parport%d.\n", pp->number);
> return;
> }
>
> - mode = db9_cfg[i].args[DB9_ARG_MODE];
> + mode = db9_cfg[port_idx].args[DB9_ARG_MODE];
>
> if (mode < 1 || mode >= DB9_MAX_PAD || !db9_modes[mode].n_buttons) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "db9.c: Bad device type %d\n", mode);
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static void db9_attach(struct parport *pp)
>
> db9_parport_cb.flags = PARPORT_FLAG_EXCL;
>
> - pd = parport_register_dev_model(pp, "db9", &db9_parport_cb, i);
> + pd = parport_register_dev_model(pp, "db9", &db9_parport_cb, port_idx);
> if (!pd) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "db9.c: parport busy already - lp.o loaded?\n");
> return;
> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static void db9_attach(struct parport *pp)
> goto err_free_dev;
> }
>
> - db9_base[i] = db9;
> + db9_base[port_idx] = db9;
> return;
>
> err_free_dev:
> @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ static void db9_detach(struct parport *port)
> return;
>
> db9 = db9_base[i];
> + db9_base[i] = NULL;
>
> for (i = 0; i < min(db9_modes[db9->mode].n_pads, DB9_MAX_DEVICES); i++)
> input_unregister_device(db9->dev[i]);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/