Re: [RFC/PATCH 11/11] arm: boot: dts: omap: add missing default status for 32k counter

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Tue Oct 06 2015 - 11:18:17 EST


* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [151006 08:02]:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Monday 05 October 2015 14:41:07 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>
> >> /**
> >> * omap_get_timer_dt - get a timer using device-tree
> >> * @match - device-tree match structure for matching a device type
> >> * @property - optional timer property to match
> >> *
> >> * Helper function to get a timer during early boot using device-tree for use
> >> * as kernel system timer. Optionally, the property argument can be used to
> >> * select a timer with a specific property. Once a timer is found then mark
> >> * the timer node in device-tree as disabled, to prevent the kernel from
> >> * registering this timer as a platform device and so no one else can use it.
> >> */
> >> static struct device_node * __init omap_get_timer_dt(const struct of_device_id *match,
> >> const char *property)
> >> {
> >> struct device_node *np;
> >>
> >> for_each_matching_node(np, match) {
> >> if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> if (property && !of_get_property(np, property, NULL))
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> if (!property && (of_get_property(np, "ti,timer-alwon", NULL) ||
> >> of_get_property(np, "ti,timer-dsp", NULL) ||
> >> of_get_property(np, "ti,timer-pwm", NULL) ||
> >> of_get_property(np, "ti,timer-secure", NULL)))
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> of_add_property(np, &device_disabled);
> >> return np;
> >> }
> >>
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> I'll patch this up and drop $subject
> >>
> >
> > Ah, good.
> >
> > I'm seeing the "ti,timer-alwon" property here, we probably need to take
> > that into account when setting the CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP flag, if
> > that isn't how it gets done already.
>
> that flag is not set for 32k in any dts. Seems like it should, though,
> judging by the binding documentation:
>
> - ti,timer-alwon: Indicates the timer is in an alway-on power
> domain.
>
> Tony, care to comment if we should add timer-alwon to 32k ?

No that should not be needed for the 32k counter. We should be able
to do everything we want with CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP for the
32k counter.

We still need ti,timer-alwon for a while for gptimers 1 and 12 as
they are the only ones in the always-on domain. I guess that need
will eventually go away too once we have a proper interconnect
driver and are using genpd.

Regards,

Tony


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/