On 10/07/15 00:33, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:17:36 +0300
Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add the ability for underlying device drivers to register the ioctlAfter discussions on and off list, the idea of an ioctl interface
commands. This is useful when some interaction with the user space
beyond sysfs capabilities is required, e.g. query the interrupt mode
or bind eventfd to interrupt notifications (similarly to vfio ioctl
VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS).
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
is just not going to be accepted upstream because it can be abused.
Therefore another API will be necessary.
I'm open for ideas. So far ioctl seems like the most appropriate candidate for the job... ;)
Ps: since I did most of this first,
this particular patch and parts of SET_IRQ code - yes. But that would be all. Let's just be specific... ;)
This still doesn't mean that u don't deserve a proper credit for that. ;) But there was a reason why I didn't do that. See below.I am surprised you never gave
any attribution for the earlier work.
If memory serves me well I asked u about the "attribution" a few days ago of the dpdk-dev list but got no answer.
Therefore I took no steps in this regard since it left me under the impression that u just didn't want it. However it seems now
that that's not the case... ;)
Pls., let me know if u want me to mention that this patch and SET_IRQ ioctl code is based on your patches on dpdk-dev list and if yes, in which
form: just mentioning it in the patch description or putting your signed-off to the patch(es).
thanks,
vlad