[RFC PATCH 1/3] Tracepoint: fix documentation of RCU lockdep checks

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

The documentation on top of __DECLARE_TRACE() does not match its
implementation since the condition check has been added to the
RCU lockdep checks. Update the documentation to match its
implementation.

Fixes: a05d59a56733 "tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks"
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/tracepoint.h | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index a5f7f3e..c8e3030 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -167,10 +167,11 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
  * structure. Force alignment to the same alignment as the section start.
  *
  * When lockdep is enabled, we make sure to always do the RCU portions of
- * the tracepoint code, regardless of whether tracing is on or we match the
- * condition.  This lets us find RCU issues triggered with tracepoints even
- * when this tracepoint is off.  This code has no purpose other than poking
- * RCU a bit.
+ * the tracepoint code, regardless of whether tracing is on. However,
+ * don't check if the condition is false, due to interaction with idle
+ * instrumentation. This lets us find RCU issues triggered with tracepoints
+ * even when this tracepoint is off. This code has no purpose other than
+ * poking RCU a bit.
  */
 #define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
 	extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name;			\
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/