Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On 10/7/15 11:21 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> so I see no reason why unprivileged eBPF couldn't have a sysctl too - with the
> default value set to permissive.

agreed. sent out v2 follows 'modules_disabled' style.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/