On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:27:38PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 10/7/2015 6:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:Wonder if Linus is going to realize that you meant 4.3 in your subject line,
Hi Linus,I posted a change equivalent to yours earlier today:
After merging Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
lib/string.c: In function 'strscpy':
lib/string.c:209:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'zero_bytemask' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
*(unsigned long *)(dest+res) = c & zero_bytemask(data);
^
Caused by commit
30035e45753b ("string: provide strscpy()")
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444229188-19640-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx
I also did no testing, but since the rest of the PPC code is similar to the
asm-generic version, I believe the zero_bytemask() definition should be OK.
It probably should go through Linus' tree, like the previous set of patches.
I just pushed it up to the linux-tile tree for Linus to grab as:
not 3.4.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmetcalf/linux-tile.git strscpy
Chris Metcalf (1):
arch/powerpc: provide zero_bytemask() for big-endian
arch/powerpc/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/