Re: [PATCH] xfs: clarify lock ordering comment

[Ross Zwisler]

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:24:50AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:58:01PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Replace "i_mmap_lock" with "mmap_lock" in the lock ordering comment above
> > xfs_filemap_page_mkwrite().  The lock in question is actually the
> > XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED rw_semaphore (no leading "i"), and this comment is
> 
> struct xfs_inode {
> ....
> 	        mrlock_t                i_mmaplock;     /* inode mmap IO lock */
> ....
> 
> > easily confused with the "i_mmap_lock_[read|write]" functions that operate
> > on struct address_space->i_mmap_rwsem.  This clarification is especially
> > important because address_space->i_mmap_rwsem is taken down in the DAX
> > code as part of this fault path.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > index f429662..b190033 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > @@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ xfs_file_llseek(
> >   *
> >   * mmap_sem (MM)
> >   *   sb_start_pagefault(vfs, freeze)
> > - *     i_mmap_lock (XFS - truncate serialisation)
> > + *     mmap_lock (XFS - truncate serialisation)
> 
> As per above, the XFS lock is "i_mmaplock"...
> 
> The lock names are annotated with the subsystem the lock belongs to
> to avoid this confusion. Along with the lock ordering (inside
> sb_start_pagefault) this should indicate that it's not the
> "i_mmap_lock (MM - vma serialisation)" lock... ;)

Ah, that makes sense, thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/