[PATCH 3.2 042/107] NFSv4: don't set SETATTR for O_RDONLY|O_EXCL

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Thu Oct 08 2015 - 20:47:38 EST


3.2.72-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>

commit efcbc04e16dfa95fef76309f89710dd1d99a5453 upstream.

It is unusual to combine the open flags O_RDONLY and O_EXCL, but
it appears that libre-office does just that.

[pid 3250] stat("/home/USER/.config", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700, st_size=8192, ...}) = 0
[pid 3250] open("/home/USER/.config/libreoffice/4-suse/user/extensions/buildid", O_RDONLY|O_EXCL <unfinished ...>

NFSv4 takes O_EXCL as a sign that a setattr command should be sent,
probably to reset the timestamps.

When it was an O_RDONLY open, the SETATTR command does not
identify any actual attributes to change.
If no delegation was provided to the open, the SETATTR uses the
all-zeros stateid and the request is accepted (at least by the
Linux NFS server - no harm, no foul).

If a read-delegation was provided, this is used in the SETATTR
request, and a Netapp filer will justifiably claim
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID, which the Linux client takes as a sign
to retry - indefinitely.

So only treat O_EXCL specially if O_CREAT was also given.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: we only check open_flags, not createmode as well]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ static int _nfs4_do_open(struct inode *d
if (server->caps & NFS_CAP_POSIX_LOCK)
set_bit(NFS_STATE_POSIX_LOCKS, &state->flags);

- if (opendata->o_arg.open_flags & O_EXCL) {
+ if ((opendata->o_arg.open_flags & (O_CREAT|O_EXCL)) == (O_CREAT|O_EXCL)) {
nfs4_exclusive_attrset(opendata, sattr);

nfs_fattr_init(opendata->o_res.f_attr);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/