Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: sun5i: Add C.H.I.P DTS

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Fri Oct 09 2015 - 11:23:45 EST


On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The C.H.I.P. is a small SBC with an Allwinner R8, 8GB of NAND, 512MB of
> RAM, USB host and OTG, a wifi / bluetooth combo chip, an audio/video jack
> and two connectors to plug additional boards on top of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-r8-chip.dts | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-r8-chip.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 342ab3116feb..bf165ed4e7fa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -600,7 +600,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN5I) += \
> sun5i-a13-olinuxino.dtb \
> sun5i-a13-olinuxino-micro.dtb \
> sun5i-a13-q8-tablet.dtb \
> - sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dtb
> + sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dtb \
> + sun5i-r8-chip.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN6I) += \
> sun6i-a31-app4-evb1.dtb \
> sun6i-a31-colombus.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-r8-chip.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-r8-chip.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0d450a828372
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-r8-chip.dts

snip

> +&reg_dcdc2 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
> + regulator-name = "cpuvdd";

Other boards seem to follow the power pin names on the SoC and call
this "vdd-cpu".

> + regulator-always-on;
> +};
> +
> +&reg_dcdc3 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> + regulator-name = "corevdd";

And this was named "vdd-int" or "vdd-int-dll" (for SoCs with separate
VDD_DLL pins).

> + regulator-always-on;
> +};
> +
> +&reg_ldo1 {
> + regulator-name = "rtcvdd";

And this one was "vdd-rtc".

I know you followed the names set in the design doc. Just wondering if there
should be some convention on these.

> +};
> +
> +&reg_ldo2 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + regulator-name = "avcc";
> + regulator-always-on;
> +};
> +
> +&reg_ldo5 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-name = "vcc-1v8";
> +};
> +
> +&reg_usb0_vbus {
> + pinctrl-0 = <&chip_vbus_pin>;
> + vin-supply = <&reg_vcc5v0>;
> + gpio = <&pio 1 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PB10 */

status = "okay"; ?

The rest looks good.

Regards
ChenYu

> +};
> +
> +&uart1 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins_b>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&uart3 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart3_pins_a>,
> + <&uart3_pins_cts_rts_a>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_otg {
> + dr_mode = "otg";
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_power_supply {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usbphy {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&chip_id_det_pin>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + usb0_id_det-gpio = <&pio 6 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PG2 */
> + usb0_vbus_power-supply = <&usb_power_supply>;
> + usb0_vbus-supply = <&reg_usb0_vbus>;
> + usb1_vbus-supply = <&reg_vcc5v0>;
> +};
> --
> 2.5.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/