Re: 4.3 group scheduling regression

[Mike Galbraith]

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 09:23 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > (change subject, CCs)
> > 
> > On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 04:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > 
> > > > Is the interactivity the same (horrible) at fe32d3cd5e8e (ie, before the
> > > > load tracking rewrite from Yuyang)?
> > 
> > It is the rewrite, 9d89c257dfb9c51a532d69397f6eed75e5168c35.
> 
> Just to be sure, so 9d89c257dfb9^1 is good, while 9d89c257dfb9 is bad?

Yeah, I went ahead and bisected.
 
> And *groan*, _just_ the thing I need on a monday morning ;-)

Sorry 'bout that.

It's odd to me that things look pretty much the same good/bad tree with
hogs vs hogs or hogs vs tbench (with top anyway, just adding up times).
Seems Xorg+mplayer more or less playing cross group ping-pong must be
the BadThing trigger.

	-Mike


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/