Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: core: Propagate voltage changes to supply regulators
From: Sascha Hauer
Date: Mon Oct 12 2015 - 07:43:08 EST
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:32:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:05:44PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > A new min_dropout_uv field is added to struct regulator_desc. Regulators
> > can specify the minimun dropout voltage they need for proper function
> > here. Now when the voltage is changed on a regulator the regulator core
> > makes sure that
>
> Can we have this interface addition as a separate patch please? Makes
> it easier to add to other devices. I could've sworn I'd already done
> that bit but obviously never got the patch mailed out.
>
> One change I think we need here is only doing the propagation if either
> the device lacks a set_voltage() operation (in which case it's just a
> switch passing through the parent voltage)
Does the lack of a set_voltage() operation automatically mean it's a
switch passing through the parent voltage? What if the regulator is a
fixed regulator and the output can't be controlled because there is only
one voltage?
Currently we bail out int regulator_set_voltage() when we do not have a
set_voltage() or set_voltage_sel() operation. Instead of propagating the
voltage change up I would keep the current behaviour and implement voltage
propagation for switches when we need it. Then we could also introduce a
REGULATOR_IS_SWITCH flag indicating that this is a switch and not a
fixed voltage regulator.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/