Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v5 0/5] Provide better MADT subtable sanity checks

From: Hanjun Guo
Date: Mon Oct 12 2015 - 21:23:44 EST


On 10/13/2015 03:21 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 03:04:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015 03:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/9/30 7:45, Al Stone wrote:
NB: this patch set is for use against the linux-pm bleeding edge
branch.


[snip...]


For this patch set,

Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Hanjun

Thanks, Hanjun!

Series applied, thanks!

Rafael


Thanks, Rafael!


Just decided to test out linux-next (to see the new nouveau cleanups).
This change set prevents my Lenovo W510 from booting properly.

Reverting: 7494b0 "ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to
eventually replace the macro"

Gets the system booting again. I'm attaching my dmesg from the failed
boot, who wants the acpidump?

[ 0.000000] ACPI: undefined version for either FADT 4.0 or MADT 1
[ 0.000000] ACPI: Error parsing LAPIC address override entry
[ 0.000000] ACPI: Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI

Seems the MADT revision is not right, could you dump the ACPI MADT
(APIC) table and send it out? I will take a look :)

Thanks
Hanjun

Here ya go, enjoy. Feel free to CC me on any patches that might fix it.

Thanks! I think I had the right guess, the MADT revision is not right
for ACPI 4.0:

[000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC
Description Table (MADT)]
[004h 0004 4] Table Length : 000000BC
[008h 0008 1] *Revision : 01*

I encountered such problem before because the table was just copied from
previous version, and without the update for table revision.

I think we may need to ignore the table revision for x86, but restrict
it for ARM64, I'd like Al and Rafael's suggestion before I send out a
patch.

As I said before to Al, we definitely can't break systems that worked before
the commit in question.

Sure :)

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/