RE: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas tree order

[Tirdea, Irina]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 October, 2015 19:31
> To: Bastien Nocera
> Cc: Mark Rutland; Tirdea, Irina; Aleksei Mamlin; Karsten Merker; linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Purdila, Octavian; lkml;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas tree order
> 
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:51 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> > > Why?
> >> >
> >> > It was already discussed in the thread for a previous version,
> >> > please
> >> > refer to that.
> >>
> >> Fine, but surely that should be in the commit message, to prevent
> >> others
> >> like myself repeatedly asking the same question?
> >
> > Fair point. Irina?
> 
> No, let's just leave poor includes alone.
> 

OK, will drop this :)

Thanks,
Irina

> --
> Dmitry