Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: implement port_fdb_dump in drivers

[Vivien Didelot]

On Oct. Tuesday 13 (42) 11:42 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Not all switch chips provide a Get Next kind of operation to dump FDB entries.
> It is preferred to let the driver handle the dump operation the way it works
> best for the chip. Thus, drop port_fdb_getnext and implement the port_fdb_dump
> operation in DSA, which pushes the switchdev FDB dump callback down to the
> drivers. mv88e6xxx is the only driver affected and is updated accordingly.
> 
> Vivien Didelot (6):
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: write VID outside of VTU Get Next code
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: write MAC outside of ATU Get Next code
>   net: dsa: add port_fdb_dump function
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_fdb_dump
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove port_fdb_getnext
>   net: dsa: remove port_fdb_getnext
> 
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6171.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6352.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.h |   5 +-
>  include/net/dsa.h           |   8 ++-
>  net/dsa/slave.c             |  26 +-------
>  6 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

I mispaste a few "return err" instead of "goto unlock" which skips a few
mutex_unlock() in mv88e6xxx.c. I'm sending a respin right away, please
ignore this v1.

Sorry,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/