[PATCH] x86/efi: Fix kernel panic when CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is enabled
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya
Date: Tue Oct 13 2015 - 15:42:32 EST
From: Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@xxxxxxxxx>
When CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is turned on, all accesses to __pa(address)
are monitored to see whether address falls in direct mapping or kernel
mapping, if it does not kernel panics. During 1:1 mapping of EFI runtime
services we access addresses which are below 4G and hence when passed as
arguments to __pa() kernel panics as reported by Dave Hansen here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/27/742. So, before calling __pa() virtual
addresses should be validated which results in skipping call to
split_page_count() and that should be fine because it is used to keep
track of direct kernel mappings and not 1:1 mappings.
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glenn P Williamson <glenn.p.williamson@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index 727158cb3b3c..3a603830503a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -648,9 +648,11 @@ __split_large_page(struct cpa_data *cpa, pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, pfn += pfninc)
set_pte(&pbase[i], pfn_pte(pfn, canon_pgprot(ref_prot)));
- if (pfn_range_is_mapped(PFN_DOWN(__pa(address)),
- PFN_DOWN(__pa(address)) + 1))
- split_page_count(level);
+ if (virt_addr_valid(address)) {
+ if (pfn_range_is_mapped(PFN_DOWN(__pa(address)),
+ PFN_DOWN(__pa(address)) + 1))
+ split_page_count(level);
+ }
/*
* Install the new, split up pagetable.
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/