Re: [RFC v6 03/25] m68k/atari: Replace nvram_{read,write}_byte with arch_nvram_ops

From: Finn Thain
Date: Wed Oct 14 2015 - 07:20:50 EST



James, would you please review and ack this patch, and patch 01/25 also?

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Finn Thain wrote:

> By implementing an arch_nvram_ops struct, any platform can re-use the
> drivers/char/nvram module without needing any arch-specific code
> in that module. Atari does so here.
>
> Atari has one user of nvram_check_checksum() whereas the other platforms
> (i.e. x86 and ARM platforms) have none at all. Replace this
> validate-checksum-and-read-byte sequence with the equivalent
> rtc_nvram_ops.read() call and remove the now unused functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Christian T. Steigies <cts@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> The advantage of the new ops struct over the old global nvram_* functions
> is that the misc device module can be shared by different platforms
> without requiring every platform to implement every nvram_* function.
> E.g. only RTC "CMOS" NVRAMs have a checksum for the entire NVRAM
> and only PowerPC platforms have a "sync" ioctl.
>
> ---
> arch/m68k/atari/nvram.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c | 8 ++--
> include/linux/nvram.h | 9 ++++
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/m68k/atari/nvram.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/m68k/atari/nvram.c 2015-08-23 20:40:55.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux/arch/m68k/atari/nvram.c 2015-08-23 20:40:57.000000000 +1000
> @@ -38,33 +38,12 @@ unsigned char __nvram_read_byte(int i)
> return CMOS_READ(NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE + i);
> }
>
> -unsigned char nvram_read_byte(int i)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned char c;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
> - c = __nvram_read_byte(i);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
> - return c;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(nvram_read_byte);
> -
> /* This races nicely with trying to read with checksum checking */
> void __nvram_write_byte(unsigned char c, int i)
> {
> CMOS_WRITE(c, NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE + i);
> }
>
> -void nvram_write_byte(unsigned char c, int i)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
> - __nvram_write_byte(c, i);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> /* On Ataris, the checksum is over all bytes except the checksum bytes
> * themselves; these are at the very end.
> */
> @@ -83,18 +62,6 @@ int __nvram_check_checksum(void)
> (__nvram_read_byte(ATARI_CKS_LOC + 1) == (sum & 0xff));
> }
>
> -int nvram_check_checksum(void)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - int rv;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
> - rv = __nvram_check_checksum();
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
> - return rv;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(nvram_check_checksum);
> -
> static void __nvram_set_checksum(void)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -106,6 +73,62 @@ static void __nvram_set_checksum(void)
> __nvram_write_byte(sum, ATARI_CKS_LOC + 1);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t nvram_read(char *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + char *p = buf;
> + loff_t i;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock);
> +
> + if (!__nvram_check_checksum()) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = *ppos; count > 0 && i < NVRAM_BYTES; --count, ++i, ++p)
> + *p = __nvram_read_byte(i);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
> +
> + *ppos = i;
> + return p - buf;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t nvram_write(char *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + char *p = buf;
> + loff_t i;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock);
> +
> + if (!__nvram_check_checksum()) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = *ppos; count > 0 && i < NVRAM_BYTES; --count, ++i, ++p)
> + __nvram_write_byte(*p, i);
> +
> + __nvram_set_checksum();
> +
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
> +
> + *ppos = i;
> + return p - buf;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t nvram_get_size(void)
> +{
> + return NVRAM_BYTES;
> +}
> +
> +const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
> + .read = nvram_read,
> + .write = nvram_write,
> + .get_size = nvram_get_size,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_nvram_ops);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> static struct {
> unsigned char val;
> Index: linux/drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c 2015-08-23 20:40:53.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux/drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c 2015-08-23 20:40:57.000000000 +1000
> @@ -880,13 +880,15 @@ static int __init atari_scsi_probe(struc
> #ifdef CONFIG_NVRAM
> else
> /* Test if a host id is set in the NVRam */
> - if (ATARIHW_PRESENT(TT_CLK) && nvram_check_checksum()) {
> - unsigned char b = nvram_read_byte(14);
> + if (ATARIHW_PRESENT(TT_CLK)) {
> + unsigned char b;
> + loff_t offset = 14;
> + ssize_t count = arch_nvram_ops.read(&b, 1, &offset);
>
> /* Arbitration enabled? (for TOS)
> * If yes, use configured host ID
> */
> - if (b & 0x80)
> + if ((count == 1) && (b & 0x80))
> atari_scsi_template.this_id = b & 7;
> }
> #endif
> Index: linux/include/linux/nvram.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/nvram.h 2015-08-23 20:40:53.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux/include/linux/nvram.h 2015-08-23 20:40:57.000000000 +1000
> @@ -10,4 +10,13 @@ extern void __nvram_write_byte(unsigned
> extern void nvram_write_byte(unsigned char c, int i);
> extern int __nvram_check_checksum(void);
> extern int nvram_check_checksum(void);
> +
> +struct nvram_ops {
> + ssize_t (*read)(char *, size_t, loff_t *);
> + ssize_t (*write)(char *, size_t, loff_t *);
> + ssize_t (*get_size)(void);
> +};
> +
> +extern const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops;
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_NVRAM_H */
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/