Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: cmpxchg: avoid warnings from macro-ized cmpxchg() implementations

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Oct 14 2015 - 11:01:58 EST


On Saturday 19 September 2015 06:42:21 Marek Vasut wrote:
> This change is similar to e001bbae7147b111fe1aa42beaf835635f3c016e
> ARM: cmpxchg: avoid warnings from macro-ized cmpxchg() implementations
>
> A recent change in kernel/acct.c added a new warning for many
> configurations using generic __xchg() implementation:
>
> In file included from ./arch/nios2/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:12:0,
> from include/asm-generic/atomic.h:18,
> from arch/nios2/include/generated/asm/atomic.h:1,
> from include/linux/atomic.h:4,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:406,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:7,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:5,
> from include/linux/mm.h:9,
> from kernel/acct.c:46:
> kernel/acct.c: In function 'acct_pin_kill':
> include/asm-generic/cmpxchg.h:94:3: warning: value computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
> ((__typeof__(*(ptr)))__cmpxchg_local_generic((ptr), (unsigned long)(o),\
> ^
> include/asm-generic/cmpxchg.h:102:28: note: in expansion of macro 'cmpxchg_local'
> #define cmpxchg(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local((ptr), (o), (n))
> ^
> kernel/acct.c:177:2: note: in expansion of macro 'cmpxchg'
> cmpxchg(&acct->ns->bacct, pin, NULL);
> ^
>
> The code is in fact correct, it's just a cmpxchg() call that
> intentionally ignores the result, and no other code does that. The
> warning does not show up on x86 because of the way that its cmpxchg()
> macro is written. This changes the asm-ggeneric implementation to use
> a similar construct with a compound expression instead of a typecast,
> which causes the compiler to not complain about an unused result.
>
> Fix the other macros in this file in a similar way, and place them
> just below their function implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Applied to my asm-generic tree, thanks!

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/