On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:37:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:Good - we have only been adding SoC compatible strings for Cygnus and NSP - not board compatibles.
On 13/10/15 14:40, Jon Mason wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:42:04PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 10/03/2015 12:22 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
Add the 4708, 4709, and 953012k SVKs to the the documentation for the
Broadcom Northstar device tree bindings.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt
index 6b0f49f..bdf4c06 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt
What should be documented in this file? This is more a question to the
guys more familiar with arm in Linux. Currently the Linux kernel only
supports brcm,bcm4708 and all goes back to that one.
I was under the impression that all boards should be added to these
files. We have been doing so for Cygnus and NSP.
Tracking exactly which boards are supported by the brcm,bcm4708
compatible string might be tedious, I tend to agree with just listing
the supported SoCs, and leaving the specific board compatibles to the
individual DTS files instead.
Ok, I'll simply add entries for NS and 4709 to this.
Thanks,
Jon
Thanks,
Jon
@@ -5,4 +5,11 @@ Boards with the BCM4708 SoC shall have the following properties:
Required root node property:
+bcm94709
compatible = "brcm,bcm4708";
+
+bcm94709
+compatible = "brcm,bcm4709", "brcm,bcm4708";
+
+bcm953012k
+compatible = "brcm,bcm5301k", "brcm,bcm4708";
--
Florian