Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep
> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is
> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
> the test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3:
>  - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.
> v2:
>  - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart.
> ---

Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next.
If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/