Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] gicv2m: acpi: Introducing GICv2m ACPI support

From: Suravee Suthikulanit
Date: Thu Oct 15 2015 - 10:30:39 EST


Hi Tomasz,

On 10/15/2015 9:03 AM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
+ if (!data)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return data->fwnode;
+}
+
+static int __init
+acpi_parse_madt_msi(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct resource res;
+ u32 spi_start = 0, nr_spis = 0;
+ struct acpi_madt_generic_msi_frame *m;
+ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = NULL;
+
+ m = (struct acpi_madt_generic_msi_frame *)header;
+ if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(m, end))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ res.start = m->base_address;
+ res.end = m->base_address + 0x1000;
+
+ if (m->flags & ACPI_MADT_OVERRIDE_SPI_VALUES) {
+ spi_start = m->spi_base;
+ nr_spis = m->spi_count;
+
+ pr_info("ACPI overriding V2M MSI_TYPER (base:%u, num:%u)\n",
+ spi_start, nr_spis);
+ }
+
+ fwnode = irq_domain_alloc_fwnode((void *)m->base_address);
+ if (!fwnode) {
+ pr_err("Unable to allocate GICv2m domain token\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = gicv2m_init_one(fwnode, spi_start, nr_spis, &res);
I case of error, we should call here:
irq_domain_free_fwnode(fwnode);

This should have already been handled when returning from the
acpi_parse_madt_msi() in gicv2m_teardown() since we would need to
iterate through all existing MSI frame to clean up.

Actually, you are correct since the fwnode allocated here might not get assigned to the v2m_data.fwnode and added to the v2m_nodes list yet. So, we would need to call irq_domain_alloc_fwnode() here in case of error.

Thanks,
Suravee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/