Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] timer: Improve itimers scalability
From: Jason Low
Date: Thu Oct 15 2015 - 15:00:33 EST
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 17:18 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> I'm going to give 4/4 a closer look to see if the races with timer
> expiration make more sense to me than last time around.
> (E.g. do CPU time signals even work in CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL?)
>
> But although I haven't yet convinced myself the current code is right,
> the changes don't seem to make it any worse. So consider all four
>
> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks George!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/