Re: [GIT PULL] workqueue fixes for v4.3-rc5

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 16:24 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:

> But in terms of API consistency, it sucks to have queue_work()
> guarantee local queueing but not queue_delayed_work().  The ideal
> situation would be updating both so that neither guarantees.

You don't have to change anything to have neither guarantee local
queueing.  Called from a preemptible context, local means any CPU in
->cpus_allowed... which makes WORK_CPU_UNBOUND mean what one would
imagine WORK_CPU_UNBOUND to mean, not bound to any particular cpu.

      sh-16017   3.N.. 1510500545us : queue_work_on: golly, migrated cpu7 -> cpu3 -- target cpu8
      sh-16017   3.N.. 1510500550us : <stack trace>
 => tty_flip_buffer_push
 => pty_write
 => n_tty_write
 => tty_write
 => __vfs_write
 => vfs_write
 => SyS_write
 => entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath

That was with a udelay(100) prior to disabling interrupts, but that just
makes it easier.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/