Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:10:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/17/2015 07:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.55 release.
> >There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 02:00:11 UTC 2015.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 127 pass: 125 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
> 	hexagon:defconfig
> 	hexagon:allnoconfig
> 
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 80 pass: 80 fail: 0
> 
> The hexagon build failures are different than before, but the builds still fail.
> 
> In file included from include/linux/mm.h:19:0,
>                  from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:28:
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:62:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_clear_bit'
> In file included from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:29:0:
> include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_disable_nosync':
> include/linux/interrupt.h:541:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__after_atomic_inc'
> include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_enable':
> include/linux/interrupt.h:553:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_atomic_dec'

Odd, any idea what we can do to fix it?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/