Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Silence tracepoint event failures

[David Ahern]

On 10/19/15 9:23 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently, when perf test is run by a normal user, it'll fail to access
> tracepoint events.  However the output is somewhat messy since it tries
> to be nice with long error messages and hints.  IMHO it's not needed
> for 'perf test' by default and AFAIK the perf test uses pr_debug()
> rather than pr_err() for such messages so that one can use -v option to
> see further details on failed testcases if needed.
-----8<-----
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c  | 2 +-
>   tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c | 2 +-
>   tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall.c           | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/