[PATCH 3.4 55/65] 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC

[lizf]

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

3.4.110-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream.

If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must*
issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or
we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives
and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused
the same tag.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/9p/client.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index b23a17c..32df0a3 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -833,7 +833,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
 	if (err < 0) {
 		if (err == -EIO)
 			c->status = Disconnected;
-		goto reterr;
+		if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
+			goto reterr;
 	}
 	if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
 		p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/