Re: tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Tue Oct 20 2015 - 10:58:44 EST


On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:49:02PM +0200, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> your patch "tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0"
> showed up as commit 399235dc6e95 in linux-next today (that is,
> next-20151020). I noticed it because we (a research group from
> Erlangen[0]) are running daily checks on linux-next.
>
> Your commit creates the following structure of #ifdef blocks in
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c following line 1088:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> ...
> #ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> ...
> #endif
> ...
> #endif
>
> Looking at the definition of CONFIG_ACPI at drivers/acpi/Kconfig, line
> 5, we see that ACPI unconditionally selects PNP, meaning that CONFIG_PNP
> is always enabled if CONFIG_ACPI has been enabled.
> Thus, the inner #ifdef statement can never evaluate to 'false' if the
> outer #ifdef evaluates to true (i.e., CONFIG_ACPI is enabled), and
> hence, the #ifdef is unnecessary.
>
> The same situation holds for the nested structure following line 1124,
> where the #ifdef CONFIG_PNP at line 1129 is unnecessary.
>
> Is this correct or did we miss something?

Good catch. Shoud I send a separate fix for this? Thanks for pointing
this out.

> Regards,
>
> Andreas
>
> [0] https://cados.cs.fau.de

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/