Re: [PATCH] module: Prevent recursion bug caused by module RCU check
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Oct 20 2015 - 13:09:25 EST
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:53:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Also, would it not be better to fix WARN_ON_ONCE() instead?
>
Clearly I'm an idiot and should stay away from the computer...
---
include/asm-generic/bug.h | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 630dd2372238..d0972fc8433f 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -110,9 +110,10 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
- if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
- if (WARN_ON(!__warned)) \
- __warned = true; \
+ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once && !__warned)) { \
+ __warned = true; \
+ WARN_ON(1); \
+ } \
unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
})
@@ -120,9 +121,10 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
- if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
- if (WARN(!__warned, format)) \
- __warned = true; \
+ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once && !__warned)) { \
+ __warned = true; \
+ WARN(1, format); \
+ } \
unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
})
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/