Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:30:36 -0400
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/20/2015 8:56 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:36:04 -0400
> > Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Allow userspace to override the default SIGKILL delivered
> >> when a task_isolation process in STRICT mode does a syscall
> >> or otherwise synchronously enters the kernel.
> >>
> > Is this really a good idea? This means that there's no way to terminate
> > a task in this mode, even if it goes astray.
> 
> It doesn't map SIGKILL to some other signal unconditionally.  It just allows
> the "hey, you broke the STRICT contract and entered the kernel" signal
> to be something besides the default SIGKILL.
> 

Ah, I misread the change log. Now looking at the actual code, it makes
sense. Sorry for the noise ;-)

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/