Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Thomas,

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:23:29 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > As discussed on IRC, another simpler (code line wise) solution is to
> > simply clear the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag in the irq-armada-370-xp, which
> > brings us back to what set_irq_flags() was doing, without actually
> > reverting Rob's patch.
> 
> I prefer that for 4.3.

Done, I've proposed a patch as a reply to this e-mail. It's a one-liner.

> > However, relying on IRQ_NOAUTOEN being cleared doesn't seem like the
> > right long term solution, which is why I implemented what I believe is
> > a (hopefully) better long term solution.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I'll go over the proposed solution tomorrow afternoon (I'm
> traveling/conferencing...)

Sure, no problem.

I also noticed that MSI interrupts are not properly re-enabled after
resume, but it's not a regression from 4.2, as I can also reproduce the
issue on 4.2, so I'll handle that separately.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/