[PATCH 3/6] keys: Be more consistent in selection of union members used

[David Howells]

From: Insu Yun <wuninsu@xxxxxxxxx>

key->description and key->index_key.description are same because
they are unioned. But, for readability, using same name for
duplication and validation seems better.

Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 security/keys/key.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c
index aee2ec5a18fc..c0478465d1ac 100644
--- a/security/keys/key.c
+++ b/security/keys/key.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc,
 
 	key->index_key.desc_len = desclen;
 	key->index_key.description = kmemdup(desc, desclen + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!key->description)
+	if (!key->index_key.description)
 		goto no_memory_3;
 
 	atomic_set(&key->usage, 1);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/