Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: consider missed ticks in full NOHZ

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:47:36PM +0900, byungchul.park@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Even though the cpu is non-idle when its tick is stoped in full NOHZ,
> current "update_cpu_load" code considers as if the cpu has been idle
> unconditionally. It's wrong. This patch makes the "update_cpu_load"
> code know if the calling path comes from full NOHZ or idle NOHZ.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>

ACK.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/