RE: [PATCH 2/2] can: xilinx: fix bug in bus error handling

[Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao]

Hi Soren,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SÃren Brinkmann [mailto:soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:03 PM
> To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> Cc: Anirudha Sarangi; wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Michal
> Simek; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: xilinx: fix bug in bus error handling
> 
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 10:16AM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
> > Simply resetting the peripheral on bus off condition is not enough,
> > Because we also need to re-initialize the whole device.
> > This patch fixes this issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c index 055d6f3..9aeb85f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > @@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ static int xcan_rx(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  	return 1;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void xcan_chip_stop(struct net_device *ndev);
> 
> Isn't it possible to move the function and avoid the forward declaration?

Yes it is possible to move the function will fix it in the next version of the patch.

Regards,
Kedar.

> 
> 	SÃren