Re: Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks)
From: Sergey Senozhatsky
Date: Fri Oct 23 2015 - 08:08:52 EST
On (10/23/15 06:43), Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Is this ok?
kernel/sched/loadavg.c: In function âcalc_load_enter_idleâ:
kernel/sched/loadavg.c:195:2: error: implicit declaration of function âquiet_vmstatâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
quiet_vmstat();
^
> Subject: Fix vmstat: make vmstat_updater deferrable again and shut down on idle
>
> Currently the vmstat updater is not deferrable as a result of commit
> ba4877b9ca51f80b5d30f304a46762f0509e1635. This in turn can cause multiple
> interruptions of the applications because the vmstat updater may run at
> different times than tick processing. No good.
>
> Make vmstate_update deferrable again and provide a function that
> shuts down the vmstat updater when we go idle by folding the differentials.
> Shut it down from the load average calculation logic introduced by nohz.
>
> Note that the shepherd thread will continue scanning the differentials
> from another processor and will reenable the vmstat workers if it
> detects any changes.
>
> Fixes: ba4877b9ca51f80b5d30f304a46762f0509e1635 (do not use deferrable delay)
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Index: linux/mm/vmstat.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ linux/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -1395,6 +1395,20 @@ static void vmstat_update(struct work_st
> }
>
> /*
> + * Switch off vmstat processing and then fold all the remaining differentials
> + * until the diffs stay at zero. The function is used by NOHZ and can only be
> + * invoked when tick processing is not active.
> + */
> +void quiet_vmstat(void)
> +{
> + do {
> + if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), cpu_stat_off))
> + cancel_delayed_work(this_cpu_ptr(&vmstat_work));
shouldn't preemption be disable for smp_processor_id() here?
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/