[PATCH 4.2 07/54] skbuff: Fix skb checksum partial check.

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 31b33dfb0a144469dd805514c9e63f4993729a48 ]

Earlier patch 6ae459bda tried to detect void ckecksum partial
skb by comparing pull length to checksum offset. But it does
not work for all cases since checksum-offset depends on
updates to skb->data.

Following patch fixes it by validating checksum start offset
after skb-data pointer is updated. Negative value of checksum
offset start means there is no need to checksum.

Fixes: 6ae459bda ("skbuff: Fix skb checksum flag on skb pull")
Reported-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h |    2 +-
 net/core/skbuff.c      |    9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -2602,7 +2602,7 @@ static inline void skb_postpull_rcsum(st
 	if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
 		skb->csum = csum_sub(skb->csum, csum_partial(start, len, 0));
 	else if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
-		 skb_checksum_start_offset(skb) <= len)
+		 skb_checksum_start_offset(skb) < 0)
 		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 }
 
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -2958,11 +2958,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_append_pagefrags);
  */
 unsigned char *skb_pull_rcsum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
 {
+	unsigned char *data = skb->data;
+
 	BUG_ON(len > skb->len);
-	skb->len -= len;
-	BUG_ON(skb->len < skb->data_len);
-	skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, skb->data, len);
-	return skb->data += len;
+	__skb_pull(skb, len);
+	skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, data, len);
+	return skb->data;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_pull_rcsum);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/