Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Refactor attributes for dynamically added

[Huang Rui]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:14:27PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:58:45AM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:42:20AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/19/2015 07:28 PM, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > >Attributes depend on the CPU model the driver gets loaded on.
> > > >Therefore, add those attributes dynamically at init time. This is more
> > > >flexible to control the different attributes on different platforms.
> > > >
> > > >Suggestedy-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
> > > >Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >---
> > > >  drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > >diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> > > >index e80ee23..41d022e 100644
> > > >--- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> > > >+++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> > > >@@ -41,12 +41,17 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > > >  #define REG_TDP_RUNNING_AVERAGE		0xe0
> > > >  #define REG_TDP_LIMIT3			0xe8
> > > >
> > > >+#define FAM15H_MIN_NUM_ATTRS		2
> > > >+#define FAM15H_NUM_GROUPS		2
> > > >+
> > > >  struct fam15h_power_data {
> > > >  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > >  	unsigned int tdp_to_watts;
> > > >  	unsigned int base_tdp;
> > > >  	unsigned int processor_pwr_watts;
> > > >  	unsigned int cpu_pwr_sample_ratio;
> > > >+	const struct attribute_group *fam15h_power_groups[FAM15H_NUM_GROUPS];
> > > >+	struct attribute_group fam15h_power_group;
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
> > > >@@ -105,29 +110,31 @@ static ssize_t show_power_crit(struct device *dev,
> > > >  }
> > > >  static DEVICE_ATTR(power1_crit, S_IRUGO, show_power_crit, NULL);
> > > >
> > > >-static umode_t fam15h_power_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> > > >-				       struct attribute *attr,
> > > >-				       int index)
> > > >+static int fam15h_power_init_attrs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > >+				   struct fam15h_power_data *data)
> > > >  {
> > > >-	/* power1_input is only reported for Fam15h, Models 00h-0fh */
> > > >-	if (attr == &dev_attr_power1_input.attr &&
> > > >-	   (boot_cpu_data.x86 != 0x15 || boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 0xf))
> > > >-		return 0;
> > > >+	int n = FAM15H_MIN_NUM_ATTRS;
> > > >+	struct attribute **fam15h_power_attrs;
> > > >
> > > >-	return attr->mode;
> > > >-}
> > > >+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xf)
> > > >+		n += 1;
> > > >
> > > >-static struct attribute *fam15h_power_attrs[] = {
> > > >-	&dev_attr_power1_input.attr,
> > > >-	&dev_attr_power1_crit.attr,
> > > >-	NULL
> > > >-};
> > > >+	fam15h_power_attrs = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, n,
> > > >+					  sizeof(*fam15h_power_attrs),
> > > >+					  GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >
> > > >-static const struct attribute_group fam15h_power_group = {
> > > >-	.attrs = fam15h_power_attrs,
> > > >-	.is_visible = fam15h_power_is_visible,
> > > >-};
> > > >-__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fam15h_power);
> > > >+	if (!fam15h_power_attrs)
> > > >+		return -ENOMEM;
> > > >+
> > > >+	n = 0;
> > > >+	fam15h_power_attrs[n++] = &dev_attr_power1_crit.attr;
> > > >+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xf)
> > > >+		fam15h_power_attrs[n++] = &dev_attr_power1_input.attr;
> > > >+
> > > >+	data->fam15h_power_group.attrs = fam15h_power_attrs;
> > > >+
> > > >+	return 0;
> > > >+}
> > > >
> > > >  static bool should_load_on_this_node(struct pci_dev *f4)
> > > >  {
> > > >@@ -186,11 +193,12 @@ static int fam15h_power_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > >  #define fam15h_power_resume NULL
> > > >  #endif
> > > >
> > > >-static void fam15h_power_init_data(struct pci_dev *f4,
> > > >-					     struct fam15h_power_data *data)
> > > >+static int fam15h_power_init_data(struct pci_dev *f4,
> > > >+				  struct fam15h_power_data *data)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	u32 val, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> > > >  	u64 tmp;
> > > >+	int ret;
> > > >
> > > >  	pci_read_config_dword(f4, REG_PROCESSOR_TDP, &val);
> > > >  	data->base_tdp = val >> 16;
> > > >@@ -211,11 +219,15 @@ static void fam15h_power_init_data(struct pci_dev *f4,
> > > >  	/* convert to microWatt */
> > > >  	data->processor_pwr_watts = (tmp * 15625) >> 10;
> > > >
> > > >+	ret = fam15h_power_init_attrs(f4, data);
> > > >+	if (ret)
> > > >+		return ret;
> > > >+
> > > >  	cpuid(0x80000007, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > > >
> > > >  	/* CPUID Fn8000_0007:EDX[12] indicates to support accumulated power */
> > > >  	if (!(edx & BIT(12)))
> > > >-		return;
> > > >+		return 0;
> > > >
> > > >  	/*
> > > >  	 * determine the ratio of the compute unit power accumulator
> > > >@@ -223,14 +235,17 @@ static void fam15h_power_init_data(struct pci_dev *f4,
> > > >  	 * Fn8000_0007:ECX
> > > >  	 */
> > > >  	data->cpu_pwr_sample_ratio = ecx;
> > > >+
> > > >+	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static int fam15h_power_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > >-					const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > >+			      const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct fam15h_power_data *data;
> > > >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > >  	struct device *hwmon_dev;
> > > >+	int ret;
> > > >
> > > >  	/*
> > > >  	 * though we ignore every other northbridge, we still have to
> > > >@@ -246,12 +261,17 @@ static int fam15h_power_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > >  	if (!data)
> > > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > >-	fam15h_power_init_data(pdev, data);
> > > >+	ret = fam15h_power_init_data(pdev, data);
> > > >+	if (ret)
> > > >+		return ret;
> > > >+
> > > >  	data->pdev = pdev;
> > > >
> > > >+	data->fam15h_power_groups[0] = &data->fam15h_power_group;
> > > >+
> > > >  	hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(dev, "fam15h_power",
> > > >  							   data,
> > > >-							   fam15h_power_groups);
> > > >+							   (const struct attribute_group **)&data->fam15h_power_groups);
> > > 
> > > Why this typecast ? It should not be needed.
> > > 
> > 
> > That's because there will be a warning without the typecast.
> > 
> > Expected 'const struct attribute_group **', but current type is 'const
> > struct attribute_group * (*)[2]'.
> > 
> 
> Maybe then either use data->fam15h_power_groups (no &) or
> &data->fam15h_power_groups[0].

Looks better. :)

> 
> On a side note, the "fam15h_" prefix in the variable name is really
> unnecessary unless there are some other groups in the same data structure.
> Even the "power_" prefix doesn't really add any value unless there
> are other groups.
> 

OK, I will update it on V3.

Thanks,
Rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/