Re: [PATCH v3] regulator, dt: add dt support for tps6502x regulator
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Oct 27 2015 - 03:26:36 EST
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:23:09AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Am 27.10.2015 um 03:12 schrieb Mark Brown:
> >Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.
> Would be "regulator: tps6520x:" correct?
Yes.
> >>+ regulators = of_get_child_by_name(np, "regulators");
> >>+ if (!regulators) {
> >>+ dev_err(dev, "regulator node not found\n");
> >>+ return NULL;
> >>+ }
> >Please use the generic support for locating the DT information for
> >regulators using regulators_node and of_match in the regulator_desc
> >rather than open coding this.
> Hmm.. could you point me to a correct example? Seems I overlook sth.
$ grep -l regulators_node drivers/regulator/*.c
drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/isl9305.c
drivers/regulator/max14577.c
drivers/regulator/max77686.c
drivers/regulator/max77693.c
drivers/regulator/max77802.c
drivers/regulator/mt6311-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/rt5033-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/sky81452-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature