Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Anyone south of Wolfram and north of the I2C ML is unlikely to care.
> 
> Actually, driver maintainers should care about their portion of it.
> Which leads me to the conclusion that driver maintainer entries in
> MAINTAINERS should have the relevant Kconfig symbol as a keyword match,
> probably.

Good point, well put.  Although this situation is fairly unique to
Kconfig changes.  In general I know I don't want to be spammed with
changes to all the files I've ever adapted though.  If people wish to
act as reviewers, they should have a mention in MAINTAINERS for
get_maintiner.pl to pull information from:

R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@domain>
   These reviewers should be CCed on patches.

Or a new marker, I: Interested parties.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/