Re: [PATCH v2] perf/core: fix RCU issues with cgroup monitoring mode

[Stephane Eranian]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 16:37 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> But that macro is already embedded into the  task_css_set() macro.
>> What we are saying here is that we have another way of ensuring the
>> cgroup cannot disappear here, and thus the rcu lockdep detects we
>> are not holding the rcu read lock but we know this is okay. We are
>> trying to avoid grabbing the rcu read lock when it is not really needed
>> to guarantee correct execution. So we are just shutting up the lockdep
>> in these particular cases by passing true as the safe argument value.
>
> Sure, but in lockdep verbs, the following :
>
> +       /* holding ctx->lock, so cgroup access is safe */
> +       cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task, true);
>
> would map to :
>
> cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task, lockdep_is_held(&ctx->lock));
>
> Notice the comment becomes useless.
>
Ok, this is more explicit for sure and should anything change, we would
catch it. I misunderstand what Eric was proposing. I will modify this for V3
then and test again.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/