Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations

[Jeff Moyer]

"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The problem is that intervening call to cond_resched().  I later want to
> inject an rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pair to allow flushing active
> dax_map_atomic() usages at driver teardown time [1].  But, I think the
> patch stands alone as a cleanup outside of that admittedly hidden
> motivation.

I'm not going to split hairs.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/