Re: [v6, 3/6] fsl/fman: Add FMan MAC support

[kbuild test robot]

Hi Igal,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/igal-liberman-freescale-com/Freescale-DPAA-FMan/20151028-205843
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=arm 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_dtsec.c: In function 'dtsec_isr':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_dtsec.c:872:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
       tpkt1 = in_be32(&regs->tpkt);
       ^
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_dtsec.c:913:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
        out_be32(&regs->rctrl,
        ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
   drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c: In function 'memac_init':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c:1189:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      reg32 = in_be32(&memac->regs->command_config);
      ^
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_memac.c:1191:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      out_be32(&memac->regs->command_config, reg32);
      ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/in_be32 +872 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_dtsec.c

   866			if (dtsec->fm_rev_info.major == 2) {
   867				u32 tpkt1, tmp_reg1, tpkt2, tmp_reg2, i;
   868				/* a. Write 0x00E0_0C00 to DTSEC_ID
   869				 *	This is a read only register
   870				 * b. Read and save the value of TPKT
   871				 */
 > 872				tpkt1 = in_be32(&regs->tpkt);
   873	
   874				/* c. Read the register at dTSEC address offset 0x32C */
   875				tmp_reg1 = in_be32(&regs->reserved02c0[27]);
   876	
   877				/* d. Compare bits [9:15] to bits [25:31] of the
   878				 * register at address offset 0x32C.
   879				 */
   880				if ((tmp_reg1 & 0x007F0000) !=
   881					(tmp_reg1 & 0x0000007F)) {
   882					/* If they are not equal, save the value of
   883					 * this register and wait for at least
   884					 * MAXFRM*16 ns
   885					 */
   886					usleep_range((u32)(min
   887						(dtsec_get_max_frame_length(dtsec) *
   888						16 / 1000, 1)), (u32)
   889						(min(dtsec_get_max_frame_length
   890						(dtsec) * 16 / 1000, 1) + 1));
   891				}
   892	
   893				/* e. Read and save TPKT again and read the register
   894				 * at dTSEC address offset 0x32C again
   895				 */
   896				tpkt2 = in_be32(&regs->tpkt);
   897				tmp_reg2 = in_be32(&regs->reserved02c0[27]);
   898	
   899				/* f. Compare the value of TPKT saved in step b to
   900				 * value read in step e. Also compare bits [9:15] of
   901				 * the register at offset 0x32C saved in step d to the
   902				 * value of bits [9:15] saved in step e. If the two
   903				 * registers values are unchanged, then the transmit
   904				 * portion of the dTSEC controller is locked up and
   905				 * the user should proceed to the recover sequence.
   906				 */
   907				if ((tpkt1 == tpkt2) && ((tmp_reg1 & 0x007F0000) ==
   908					(tmp_reg2 & 0x007F0000))) {
   909					/* recover sequence */
   910	
   911					/* a.Write a 1 to RCTRL[GRS] */
   912	
 > 913					out_be32(&regs->rctrl,
   914						 in_be32(&regs->rctrl) | RCTRL_GRS);
   915	
   916					/* b.Wait until IEVENT[GRSC]=1, or at least

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: Binary data